Bookmark and Share

Tags

32nm 40nm 45nm AMD Apple ASUS ATI Atom Business Cypress DRAM E-Book Evergreen Fermi Flash Geforce Globalfoundries GT300 Intel Microsoft Nforce Nintendo Nokia Nvidia OCZ Radeon Semiconductor Sony SSD Windows

News

Remote video game streaming services like Gaikai or OnLive, which were launched earlier this year, will not be able to compete against local machines in the foreseeable future, claims Microsoft Corp. But the world’s largest designer of software believes that in longer term those services will make sense.

“I think streaming technology is something that [the industry] is betting on longer term. Right now I don’t believe that technology can scale out against the experience we can offer on a local machine. The technology will continue to improve. As an industry, we’ll have to accept that and move with it – but I don’t think it’s on an accelerated timeline for the foreseeable future,” said Jerry Johnson, product unit manager of Xbox Live at Microsoft, at London Games Conference, reports MCV web-site.

Remote video game streaming services, which allow their customers to play games that are processed by the server, not by the local hardware, have three main advantages over contemporary consoles or personal computers: gamers do not need to buy expensive hardware (which means that more people can be addressed), gamers do not need to acquire games themselves in a retail stores or carry any physical media (which makes games more affordable or even free in certain cases), gamers cannot pirate software.

But while remote game streaming services have a number of benefits, they are hard to implement from technology standpoint (Internet still generates input lags, video needs to be compressed and decompressed, etc.) and their economic model also does not seem to be really feasible (one customer should be provided with enough performance to play a game with 1920x1080 resolution with all the bells and whistles enabled, which typically means dedicated graphics processor and at least two CPU cores, something not exactly cheap).

In the long run the advantages of remote game streaming services may surpass their drawbacks, however, it looks like this will hardly be the case for the next ten years.

Tags: Microsoft, Xbox, OnLive, Gaikai

Discussion

Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 10/28/09 04:56:35 AM
Latest comment: 10/28/09 04:56:35 AM

[1-1]

1. 
IMO their success will depend mainly on the pricing model. I can certainly see such services as a good way for users to test games without having to buy them. Also for users who don't care much about image quality, it'd allow them to play new games on very low spec hardware.
[Posted by: ET3D  | Date: 10/28/09 04:56:35 AM]

[1-1]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Thursday, November 26, 2009

3:53 pm | European Commission Accuses CRT Makers of Forming Cartels. Just When CRT Era is Over, European Commission Accuses CRT Makers of Law Violation

3:20 pm | ATI Eliminates Multi-GPU Performance Boosting Technology from Latest Chips. Sideport Not Present in ATI Radeon HD 5000 GPUs – Company

2:35 pm | Nintendo: Wii is the Most Popular Game Console Among Women. Wii Popularity – Result of Deliberate Attempt to Expand the Market, Claims Nintendo

11:11 am | Nvidia Quietly Unveils GeForce 310, GeForce 205 Graphics Cards. Nvidia GeForce 205: Performance of GeForce FX in 2009

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

10:44 pm | Infineon and Nokia to Jointly Develop LTE Transceiver Solutions. Infineon and Nokia Collaborate on 4G/LTE Technology

5:50 pm | U.S. Patent Office Again Rejects Rambus’ Claims Against Nvidia. Nvidia Wins Another Round in Patent Dispute with Rambus

2:36 pm | EA Montreal to Concentrate on High-Def Games, Lower Focus on Wii. Large Video Game Developer to Re-Focus on HD Blockbuster Titles

11:58 am | AMD to Describe 32nm x86-64 Processor at Chip Conference [UPDATED]. AMD to Reveal Power Trimming Technologies of Next-Generation Mobile Chip